Tuesday, March 5, 2013

F*cking Up: Dating Strategies for Maximum Class Mobility and their Potential Pitfalls


        Although the United States we are in the new millennium has overcome many social barriers, there is still prejudice and sexism in society today. Sexual harassment in the workplace, although being cracked down on by law, managerial and business codes, it is still prominent and makes it very hard for a woman to be successful in the workplace. Stereotypes, biases, and prejudices consistently get in the way for women, and as a result, women have had to come up with various strategies to get ahead in modern society. One way is to marry above one’s own social class for financial gain and class mobility.
There have been numerous examples in popular culture of women using men as a springboard for their own success, whether it is intentional or unintentional. Take the Grimm fairy tale Cinderella for example. Most everyone knows the story of the poor ‘Cinder’ girl whose cruel and abusive stepmother refuses to let the girl go to a festival being hosted by the local prince, for fear she will marry him, and instead endorses her own two daughters in wedding the prince. In fact, one of the stepdaughters is willing to do anything to fit the shoe Cinderella wore and become wealthy, even when “her mother gave her a knife and said, ‘Cut the toe off; when thou art Queen thou wilt have no more need to go on foot’” (Grimm).  The level of desperation, although somewhat exaggerated, shows the steps women are willing to take to advance themselves socially, including cutting off one’s toes. Every eligible woman who attended that ball, and tried on that shoe was there to advance themselves from simple peasants to royalty. None of these women knew, or had even met the prince, but were willing to try and impress him for a hand in marriage. Therefore, acquiring a man’s wealth and property through marriage is an acceptable and successful way to improve one’s current standard of living and social class. This message is portrayed to young girls who either read an adaptation in a children’s book, see it re-enacted in a cartoon or movie, or from being told the story directly. Women are raised to think in this mind-set, so naturally women are bound to act on it.
Children are not the only ones who are fed this ‘get-rich-quick’ scheme. Adult women reading romance novels are getting the same ideas, though perhaps not as subtly. Jeanne Dubino, an English professor at Plymouth State College, writes about the effects of different romance novels on many types of women, and at the core of all of these novels is the same idea. She writes, “All varieties of the romance contain the pattern of ‘heroine gets rich through love’” (103). In general, women are surrounded by this idea from the moment they learn to read up until they read to escape their own realities, affecting the way they see relationships and marriage as a whole.
Of course most people want to fall in love and marry a spouse that they feel attracted to and can look to as an equal partner for the rest of their lives…but wouldn’t it be grand to find that person, and they just so happen to have the financial security to take care of you for the rest of your lives? In the hit single, “Ain’t Nothin’ Goin’ On But the Rent” by Gwen Guthrie, she proclaims that there is “no romance without finance”. This suggests that if all you’ve got is love, then that isn’t going to be enough to keep the two of you together. Love doesn’t pay the rent or buy groceries, and there has to be some sort of financial income. Love is not all you need.
            But what if you don’t seek to marry that person? Dating can be just as successful with one’s own advancement in modern-day society. A couple of lunch dates and intimate get-togethers with one’s boss can either boost your career by receiving unfair benefits and advantages over fellow co-workers in exchange for your company, or it can ruin your reputation in the workplace and ruin your career. For example, say a female secretary works for a male CEO of a large corporation. If this hypothetical secretary were to be sexually involved with her boss, and was given bonuses based solely upon their personal interactions, and somehow this information was spread to the secretary’s fellow co-workers, this would prove to be a poor choice. Rumors carry easily and if this woman’s unprofessionalism spreads to other companies, then if for some reason her boss lets her go or lays her off, it would be difficult to find another job.
            Ruining one’s career and reputation are a trade-off and gambling piece. Although marrying into wealth or dating to get to the top seem like easy and fool-proof methods to success, there are several negative consequences; the first being that there is the issue of morals and values. If a woman feels it is necessary to pursue a man she does not love purely for financial gain, one must wonder about the conscience and overall happiness of that woman. To be willing to sacrifice the option of a mutually loving and caring marriage for financial security, there are definite psychological effects, not to mention the effects of their children (if any). Children pick up on the moods and emotions of the parents towards each other, and children raised in a hostile environment are more likely to have social and psychological problems later in life (Buehler, Krishnakumar, & Anthony 1994). Although the negative aftermath of such choices are clearly evident, if money and social standing are what is important to oneself, then these options can (somewhat) guarantee a financially successful life.  
So whether it be a marriage into a wealthy family, or a rendezvous with a CEO, it is pretty clear that dating and marrying above one’s own social standing is a good way to get a woman in 2012 where she wants to be. Skip past the sexual harassment of the workplace, fast forward through the expensive and stressful years of college, and go for the gold. Dig if you must, as long as you get what you want.
           





Works Cited
Buehler, Cheryl, Ambika Krishnakumar, and Christine Anthony. "Hostile Interparental Conflict And Youth Maladjustment." Family Relations 43.(1994): 409-416. Education Full Text (H.W. Wilson). Web. 4 Nov. 2012. 
Dubino, Jeanne. "The Cinderella Complex: Romance Fiction, Patriarchy and Capitalism." Journal of Popular Culture 27.3 (1993): 103-118. Academic Search Premier. Web. 28 Oct. 2012.
Guthrie, Gwen. "Ain't Nothin' Goin' On But the Rent." Rec. 1985. Ain't Nothin' Goin' On But the Rent. Vinyl recording. 1986.
Grimm, The Bros. “Cinderella”. NationalGeographic.com. National Geographic Society. 1999. Web. 28 October 2012. 

No comments:

Post a Comment